The State
of
Carlos Vargas-Ramos, Ph.D.
Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueρos
Hunter College, CUNY
SUMMARY
This
project offers information on housing conditions for Latinos relative to the
overall population of the United States, based on survey data collected in the
American Housing Survey for the years 1997, 1999, 2001 and 2003 (the last year
for which data are available). Major
findings are as follows:
·
The majority of Latinos in the
·
Latinos had to use a greater proportion of
resources for their housing expenses than the overall population. Latinos have
to do more with fewer resources. They paid 4% more in monthly housing costs
than the population as a whole in 2003, with a median household income that was
20% lower than for the overall population. These 2003 data also reflected a
reversal in the trend observed in the late 1990s, which saw the relative
difference in housing costs for Latinos decrease, and return to levels last
seen eight years ago. Latinos also received fewer subsidies (69% less) to cover
their rental expenses than the population as a whole.
·
Living conditions for Latinos tend to be worse
than for the population as a whole. Their
homes tended to be overcrowded at rates that were five or six times greater
than for the population as a whole. Moreover, Latinos tended to live in homes
that were physically smaller (by 17%) than for the population as a whole. The combination of more
people living in smaller spaces mean that Latinos have more than a third
less living space than the overall population.
·
Latino homes also tend to be older than those in
which the overall population lives. These homes also tended to exhibit similar physical
conditions, such as lacking adequate plumbing, a water source that was unsafe
to drink, or structurally deteriorated facilities that result in worse living
conditions than the homes of the population as a whole.
In
order to reverse these conditions, we recommend the following:
·
At the Federal level: An increase in the stock of
housing, particularly for people in the middle and lower income levels by
maintaining and expanding income tax credits, enforcement of Community
Reinvestment Act regulations, and expansion of the Section 8 program and public
housing.
·
At the State and local levels: greater vigilance
of quality of the existing housing stock and increase assistance to
anti-abandonment efforts.
·
At a more general governmental level: an increase
in the minimum wage rate to a living wage rate; the elimination of predatory
lending practices to reduce insurance and mortgage costs for homeowners; the
redistribution of funding sources for education from the local level to the
State and Federal levels to lessen over-reliance on local property taxes.
·
Greater reliance on limited-equity and
limited-profit housing to reduce up-front cost for prospective homebuyers.